Anonymous ID: f3f688 Dec. 27, 2020, 1:57 p.m. No.12199357   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9402 >>9432 >>9657 >>9793

4881

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 10/17/2020 12:36:26 ID: f457dc

Archive Bread/Post Links: 11117973 / 11118631

Direct Link: 11118631

https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746

There is 'Q'. 1

There are 'Anons'. 2

There is no 'Qanon'. 3

Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?

DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?

Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].

You are correct, CJ.

Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]

Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?

Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.

Q

Anonymous ID: f3f688 Dec. 27, 2020, 2:10 p.m. No.12199517   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12199459

>you aren't Q

I don't care that you can't tolerate the fact that you're not Q and that you then project that issue on to me.

 

You spam replying a post with a Q drop isn't needed.

 

Stop sending spam replies to posts with Q drops.

 

You pathetic shills getting triggered by that Q drop is a big reason that drop keeps getting posted.

 

And if you're sooooo concerned with spam posts, which I know you're not, but if you were, you'd be spam replying posts with the 'Q_Anon' banner, you hypocritical lying triggered fuck.

 

FILTERED

Anonymous ID: f3f688 Dec. 27, 2020, 2:11 p.m. No.12199534   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12199494

4881

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 10/17/2020 12:36:26 ID: f457dc

Archive Bread/Post Links: 11117973 / 11118631

Direct Link: 11118631

https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746

There is 'Q'. 1

There are 'Anons'. 2

There is no 'Qanon'. 3

Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?

DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?

Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].

You are correct, CJ.

Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]

Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?

Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.

Q