>newfag trumpcucked Q-tard claiming I'm the one from plebbit
Cute
No females allowed
>NK being freed
How is NK freed? By caving to the American empire? So that it can become a consumerist nightmare like South Korea, filled with worthless vapid whores and shit culture?
North Korea was already the freest nation on earth. This move can only degrade it.
Stop posting that communist shill edit. Here's the real version
NK is literally one of the only anti-globalist nations on earth. But now they seem to be caving in to Americanized globalized shit culture. We can only hope that they turn back and remain nationalist.
A nation is an ethnic group, by definition. America is not a nation. It's a multinational empire, and it needs to be abolished.
The word "Patriot" comes from the Greek "pater," for father. It denotes ancestry. So, no, you're wrong and you need to learn the definition of words.
The term you are looking for is "regime loyalist." Regime loyalists to the American empire have no skin color, and we will kill them all accordingly.
>When whites give way to minorities, will the nation only be 3/5 as good?
You wish. Go spend a few hours on liveleak watching videos of cartels torturing people and skinning them alive if you want a glimpse of the fruits of civic nationalism.
>using the modern Jewish perversion of the true definition
Anon… educate yourself
https://www.etymonline.com/word/nation
>from Latin nationem (nominative natio) "birth, origin; breed, stock, kind, species; race of people, tribe," literally "that which has been born,"
Nation is a racial term. It has nothing to do with the state or geographic territory or "culture" or any other shit.
>Would abolishing the empire built affect America's worldwide influence negatively, or positively?
And of course it would affect it negatively, which is a good thing. America is a cancer, so it is desirable for its "worldwide influence" to be curtailed.