Anonymous ID: d95a07 Dec. 27, 2020, 3:32 p.m. No.12200567   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>12199931

 

I agree about this not being a bunker bomb missile. The physics and the nature of the explosion do not line up. Missiles at fast speeds cannot make sharp 90 degree bends. This missile theory demands that two were made.

 

Also there was a public announcement of the imminent explosion. If you wanted to blow up your own building you wouldn’t use a bunker buster… far too many possible complications. If you were going to use a bunker buster covertly you wouldn’t use a public announcement. So the two wouldn’t be used together. This flys in the face of the bunker buster theory.

 

That being said it is clear from the scorch marks and siding that the explosion came from within the building. Gun shots were not gunshots but controlled demolition before detonation of the huge explosion.

 

The easiest and therefore most likely explanation is this.

 

  1. The initial demolitions were set off in the building.

  2. Electronic public announcement begins announcing explosion is imminent.

  3. Another second of demolitions goes off.

  4. A third set of demolitions goes of.

  5. A large bomb is set off.

 

Only 3 people were injured. This was a controlled demolition/burn.