Anonymous ID: 691447 Dec. 27, 2020, 4:13 p.m. No.12201121   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1152

>>12201012

So they don't know the long-term efficacy of the vaccine or whether it will prevent you from spreading it to others (see link) … but Bill knows after a couple of weeks of vaccine trials that there are no "long-term side effects"? Keeping in mind the mRNA approach to this vaccine is a "new, never before used" technology for vaccination.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/08/health/covid-vaccine-mask.html

Anonymous ID: 691447 Dec. 27, 2020, 4:24 p.m. No.12201271   🗄️.is 🔗kun

At best, these big chem companies have been ruthless in prioritizing profit over humanity's health. At worst, they have been complicit in a campaign to make it their priority to weaken us, bankrupt us and make us sicker while suppressing cheaper, more effective cures. But all of a sudden we are supposed to believe that these companies are so reformed that we can trust their vaccines? So let's say this vaccine is a revolutionary strategy to help us, and under POTUS they have been forced tor release something with huge potential benefits; how do we then ensure that the global supply chain is safe from these same companies who have a hsitory of doing us harm? How do we know that they don't change the formula of the vaccine at any time? Does POTUS have to stand watch over every manufacturer and shipment? How do I know the providence of my vaccine? How do I know my government is going to receive and distribute the exact same one that is currently approved for "emergency use"? Why do I have to take a vaccine for a virus which will almost certainly not hurt me — that is, why are the most vulnerable not the ones to get the (good) vaccine, so they are protected by the "stubborn fools" like me who will currently refuse to take it? Especially considering that the New York Times says that me getting the vaccine doesn't mean I can't give the virus to someone else (i.e., if it's only efficacious to protect myself, and not others, I'll take my own chances, thanks).