>>12193869 (pb about ADE-antibody dependent enhancement)

I wanted to respond to this post earlier and didn't get to. I think that there is a stronger propensity for ADE in situations where the immune system is primed to respond by an antigen that is INJECTED rather than absorbed or assimilated in the normal manner. I think if ADE is a factor in coronavirus disease it is because the person's immune system was primed by an atypical exposure perhaps via a flu or other vaccine that was contaminated or which has the "viral" antigens for another reason.

If you consider Dengue fever you will see why this (ADE) is an issue with dengue but not other apparently transmissible "viruses"? Why? Because the dengue "virus" gets into the human body via INJECTION from an infected mosquito.

Vaccines are not helpful for dengue except possibly in a few cases. The rollout of Dengvaxia in the Philippines was an unmitigated disaster as people, especially children with no previous exposure to dengue, became very, very ill upon exposure subsequent to being vaccinated. I noticed that the protocol for Dengvaxia involves giving it to people who were previously exposed naturally and the regime involves a series of three shots. In this example, the "vaccine" might more correctly (this is my hypothesis) be considered an "allergy shot" and not a vaccine as the goal of vaccination is to REDUCE the overheated immune response not to promote a strong reaction.

The mention of the 1918 flu is missing important information about an experimental meningitis vaccine program that was apparently linked to the start of that pandemic. Once you realize that Frederick Gates' experimental meningitis vaccine program on military recruits aligns with the location and timeframe for the origin of "Spanish flu" you have a good guess as to the real culprit behind the origin of that pandemic.