>>12202082 lblblblblb
no this is on potus
100%
its not good
not good at all
seems like a complete cop out
oh mebbe ill make up a reason like he had to or couldnt finish his plan and play the trump card
nope not buying it
good bred title WE havnt given up
wtf is this? at least an explanation
this is exactly wut potus complained about with scotus
yeah im sure piglosi will be very cooperative
thats the explanation?
fail
fail
fail
hope the next month doesnt continue like this but one can only make excuses for so long
its not that
it isnt about anons imo
its about right and wrong
this is wrong
that said all can be forgiven IF he stops bidan and the DS
but he only has until 1/20 for that
hard deadline this time
no more excuses
wtf he is playing CHINESE POKER
they see his hand on his forehead
this is inexcusable
i dont see piglosi tweeting her agreement with this
uhhh doesnt congress include the house?
what promised have they made?
and who would trust them to follow up?
either this is complete faggotry or again we are not being given the whole story
no i dont think so
READ
The 1974 Congressional Budget and Impoundment Act created a set of institutional changes designed to help Congress regain power over the budget process. The Act was inspired by Richard Nixon's refusal to disburse nearly $12 billion of congressionally-appropriated funds in 1973-74 through the executive power of impoundment, as well as more generalized fears about the budget deficit. Nixon claimed that the deficit was causing high inflation and that as a result he needed to curb government spending. To this effect, in the 1972 presidential election he called on Congress to grant the President authority to cut federal spending so as to keep the budget under control. Congress opposed Nixon's proposal and instead sought to reform Congress' budgetary role. In 1972 Congress created a Joint Study Committee on Budget Control which called for procedural reforms to enable Congress to examine the federal budget from an "overall point of view, together with a congressional system of deciding priorities." Following Nixon's impoundment Congress acted on these recommendations and in 1974 Congress passed the Act and the President signed the legislation.
The Act had two main goals: (1) strengthen and centralize Congress' budget authority; (2) reduce the President's impoundment authority. The latter was done by drafting detailed guidelines restricting how the President can impound funds already appropriated by Congress.
really?
Title X of the Act, also known as the Impoundment Control Act of 1974, specifies that the President may request that Congress rescind appropriated funds. If both the Senate and the House of Representatives have not approved a rescission proposal (by passing legislation) within 45 days of continuous session, any funds being withheld must be made available for obligation. Congress is not required to vote on the request, and has ignored most Presidential requests
read it and weep anons
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-88/pdf/STATUTE-88-Pg297.pdf
bullshit
wrong
he made a REQUEST to rescind the funds
congress can REJECT this request
it has no force of law
sauce
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-88/pdf/STATUTE-88-Pg297.pdf
section 5B which potus left OUT of his message see below
2 U.S. Code § 683 - Rescission of budget authority
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
(a)Transmittal of special message
Whenever the President determines that all or part of any budget authority will not be required to carry out the full objectives or scope of programs for which it is provided or that such budget authority should be rescinded for fiscal policy or other reasons (including the termination of authorized projects or activities for which budget authority has been provided), or whenever all or part of budget authority provided for only one fiscal year is to be reserved from obligation for such fiscal year, the President shall transmit to both Houses of Congress a special message specifying—
(1)the amount of budget authority which he proposes to be rescinded or which is to be so reserved;
(2)any account, department, or establishment of the Government to which such budget authority is available for obligation, and the specific project or governmental functions involved;
(3)the reasons why the budget authority should be rescinded or is to be so reserved;
(4)to the maximum extent practicable, the estimated fiscal, economic, and budgetary effect of the proposed rescission or of the reservation; and
(5)all facts, circumstances, and considerations relating to or bearing upon the proposed rescission or the reservation and the decision to effect the proposed rescission or the reservation, and to the maximum extent practicable, the estimated effect of the proposed rescission or the reservation upon the objects, purposes, and programs for which the budget authority is provided.
(b)Requirement to make available for obligation
Any amount of budget authority proposed to be rescinded or that is to be reserved as set forth in such special message shall be made available for obligation unless, within the prescribed 45-day period, the Congress has completed action on a rescission bill rescinding all or part of the amount proposed to be rescinded or that is to be reserved. Funds made available for obligation under this procedure may not be proposed for rescission again.
congress can legally ignore POTUS redlines
btw this law was passed to LIMIT this potus tactic when Nixon tried it and congress said FU
>(b)Requirement to make available for obligation
>Any amount of budget authority proposed to be rescinded or that is to be reserved as set forth in such special message shall be made available for obligation unless, within the prescribed 45-day period, the Congress has completed action on a rescission bill rescinding all or part of the amount proposed to be rescinded or that is to be reserved. Funds made available for obligation under this procedure may not be proposed for rescission again.
no you are wrong
here is the LAW
see 5b - congress has to pass a new law approving any redlines
\
2 U.S. Code § 683 - Rescission of budget authority
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
(a)Transmittal of special message
Whenever the President determines that all or part of any budget authority will not be required to carry out the full objectives or scope of programs for which it is provided or that such budget authority should be rescinded for fiscal policy or other reasons (including the termination of authorized projects or activities for which budget authority has been provided), or whenever all or part of budget authority provided for only one fiscal year is to be reserved from obligation for such fiscal year, the President shall transmit to both Houses of Congress a special message specifying—
(1)the amount of budget authority which he proposes to be rescinded or which is to be so reserved;
(2)any account, department, or establishment of the Government to which such budget authority is available for obligation, and the specific project or governmental functions involved;
(3)the reasons why the budget authority should be rescinded or is to be so reserved;
(4)to the maximum extent practicable, the estimated fiscal, economic, and budgetary effect of the proposed rescission or of the reservation; and
(5)all facts, circumstances, and considerations relating to or bearing upon the proposed rescission or the reservation and the decision to effect the proposed rescission or the reservation, and to the maximum extent practicable, the estimated effect of the proposed rescission or the reservation upon the objects, purposes, and programs for which the budget authority is provided.
(b)Requirement to make available for obligation
Any amount of budget authority proposed to be rescinded or that is to be reserved as set forth in such special message shall be made available for obligation unless, within the prescribed 45-day period, the Congress has completed action on a rescission bill rescinding all or part of the amount proposed to be rescinded or that is to be reserved. Funds made available for obligation under this procedure may not be proposed for rescission again.
yes it is
but POTUS cannot force change or funding once he signs
congress MUST approve
read the law posted here 3 times already
yes i know
this is the law that potus cited in his signing statement
for OMNIBUS spending bill
come on faggots pay attention
>This a load of shit?
YES
it doesnt force them to do it
cannot force congress to do it
and this is FAR from unknown
it already came up in muhimpeachment and the wall funding in this term!
OK? fucking idiots post shit