>BUNK! ECW did NOT post this to his twitter.
It was a 'liked' tweet
I looked for and saw it last night
>BUNK! ECW did NOT post this to his twitter.
It was a 'liked' tweet
I looked for and saw it last night
>Listen Up!!!! POTUS signed with CONDITIONS of the 1974 Impoundment Act!!! POTUS IN FULL CONTROL! COULD BE CHECK MATE!!!
Anons should read up on the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974
Then it will all make sense what POTUS has done
Short version, very short:
Get rid of the shit I told you to in 45 days
An "impoundment" is any action or inaction by an officer or employee of the federal government that precludes obligation or expenditure of budget authority. The President has no unilateral authority to impound funds. The Impoundment Control Act of 1974 (ICA) allows the President to impound funds when he transmits a "special message" in accordance with the ICA. Upon sending the message, amounts proposed for rescission (that is, for permanent cancellation) may be impounded for a period of 45 days of continuous congressional session. At issue here is whether the ICA allows such an impoundment for fixed-period appropriations expiring during this 45-day period to continue through the date on which the funds would expire. We conclude that the ICA does not permit the impoundment of funds through their date of expiration. The plain language of the ICA permits only the temporary withholding of budget authority and provides that unless Congress rescinds the amounts at issue, they must be made available for obligation. Amounts proposed for rescission must be made available for prudent obligation before the amounts expire, even where the 45-day period provided in the ICA approaches or spans the date on which funds would expire.
https://www.gao.gov/products/b-330330.1
https://bancroft.berkeley.edu/ROHO/projects/debt/budgetcontrolact.html
>New Dan vid on fakebook
looks like a storm to me
>I'll have to take your word for it. Requires login to view on fuckbook
^^^^^^
pic is for you