I understand the temptation to seek validation, but in a way, I am glad Q has not replied directly to me. First - my ego doesn't need it… It's a distraction of a sort. I don't need a pat on the head that says "good job". I want to be right about things, not fed treats like a pet. There are plenty of people who chair high offices who hand out treats for being wrong.
I don't need the comfortable/lazy way of getting validation by authority. I would prefer, if I must live in an empire of lies, to be the court jester who laughs as Babel is struck dumb. That is the cynnic in me - but if truth is treason then order is insanity. Far be it the place of the jester to suggest there is an impervious mass known as "ground" beneath the airplane fascinated with their triumph over gravity as everyone floats in free-fall. How foolish. The gods of the holy pit of cock showed that old wives tale what-for.
I digress.
Q seems to respond to make an example/point to the audience, more so than the individual. A post that fits the parameters of what Q is trying to say is picked out of the flurry and the point made. Much of what Q has posted, recently, is stuff from earlier drops or things we speculated on long ago. It wasn't the time to confirm or deny our speculation, back then - and so Q left much of that alone.
Tiredfag is ramblefag.