>how if signed into law already it can change
by the exact same process
congress passes changes requested (temporarily halted) by potus
potus signs
if not then it stays as is
we are here
read and heed
when the time comes….
behind every blade of grass…
“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family?
Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?…
[…] If…if… We didn’t love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation…. We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”
― Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn , The Gulag Archipelago
correct - without changes
changes require congress approval
many shitposts and shillposts saying otherwise here and twitter
disinfo
potus cited the portion of the law that permits his challenges/impoundments but did NOT include section 5b which makes it clear absent congress passing changes the law stands as signed by potus
this is a complete misreading of the EO
this EO is for mop up forfeiture of assets not for criminal cases
the report itself might be part of the optics of criminal cases but the EO has zero to do with that directly
the amount of disinfo and misinfo on everything trump is MASSIVE
read for yourself
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-imposing-certain-sanctions-event-foreign-interference-united-states-election/