Anonymous ID: e54a42 Dec. 28, 2020, 1:02 p.m. No.12213019   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3134

>>12212781 (lb)

>>12212810 (lb)

>>12212984 (lb)

Doesn't matter if they are pro/anti Q. It should be assumed that people with a name/reputation in enemy territory are going to be "anti-Q". Stop following people based on their views of Q. Don't "follow" people, generally speaking. Pay attention to information, and the information ONLY. Not the source/person as much. Try to be impartial.

Anonymous ID: e54a42 Dec. 28, 2020, 1:47 p.m. No.12213587   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3684

>>12213399

A tweet posted here with no link to the tweet by someone that tweets out information with no documented sources.

https://twitter.com/BarnettforAZ/status/1343634733650030592

 

FFS, anons;we all believe it. We do demand sources and proofs, though. I'm not sure why this is such a fucking hard concept to grasp.