What you attempted to insult that other anon with was akin to calling him a jew.
(pic related)
FYI
Wonder if because cost is an issue a the VA.
Or if you are in some covert "study group" where they don't want to administer them.
They are bad. But you have to wonder why they don't just give them to everyone like other doctors.
Not fishing anon. Just cant stand people making incorrect assumptions about history that has been proven…
Take it how you wish.
The "Patent Pending Poontang Punch" TM
(or kick).
That is hard to prosecute in court as those things bleed even when you don't punch em- right!!!
-Kek
I follow it now.
Seriously, what man would not want to have a child with her?!?!
Oh the flip side, who wants to get Michaelle Obama pregnant…
(no one can, but that wasn't the question!)
My daughter had two boys (youngest is 1 this week) and she is 45. Spit em out like a champ and breastfeeding. She is fit as can be, and very pretty like FLOTUS, I just pity her being 70 when they are out school if she makes it that old. But Flotus will have plenty of help thru aging.
Right…
It sucks one way or the other.
Just make plans for inevitable and have fun along the way…
Plausible.
(Likely even).
Lots of talk about accelerometer component being a vulnerable component of guidance.
Also consider "data output" of device being compromised in some manner.
(perhaps modulated wave as you describe is designed into the device as a back door way of fuckery on purpose)
I am leaving for work in 1 min.
But I need to get one and test it.
Modulating that "resonant" emission could induce a data output stream that is "false" but "confirmed" by the device as valid.
A resonant "jamming" would (you would think) issue a erroneous data output, or a signal that would be unlike a valid one.
Perhaps they did not program that anomaly into the devices range of sensing.
Or they used it as a vulnerability.
The mechanism I describe (modulated) would be able to FAKE data instead of just scrambling it. Leading the guidance systems to believe the data is "real".
Resonant noise would (should) be able to be "spotted" by looking at the data stream (intelligently of course) but a faked data output would be above scrutiny.
(sorry will not reply. I am rolling out to work. If I am dead wrong I apologize in advance but it's a theory)