Anonymous ID: f16021 Dec. 28, 2020, 9:19 p.m. No.12218808   🗄️.is 🔗kun

So after a few shills came here to insinuate that accused Nashville bomber Anthony Quinn was a "Qanon believer," there has not yet been any real MSM corroboration of that conspiracy theory. However, MSM is now trying to associate "Qanon" with Quinn by saying Qanon followers theorizing about Quinn's probable innocence. The attempt by MSM here strikes me as a bit lame actually, if only because the media themselves say Quinn is only "accused", which means he's not yet innocent or guilty, which means it shouldn't be too outrageous to speculate whether he did or didn't do it. In fact it would probably be the only right thing to do! Presumption of innocence and all that nonsense, you know.

 

Meanwhile, Daily Beast tries to add insult to injury by reporting how Qanons on twitter are supposedly speculating about the accused man's name as somehow being a version of the phrase "Q WARN". I'm not sure how these Qanons on twitter are arriving at that conclusion, but it does suddenly become quite apparent that Anthony Quinn's name does itself contain the word "QANON" and that is perhaps a better theory and just too coincidental to ignore, since in any FF at this juncture, the enemy would at least want to associate the name subliminally with that which they fear the most.

 

Q uinn AN th ON y

 

The enemy is really into the power of names, remember. Just like in the race hate-crime committed by Derek Chauvin (George Floyd's killer), whose name rather coincidentally mean's "racist" in French.

 

https://www.thedailybeast.com/nashville-bomber-anthony-quinn-warner-is-embraced-by-conspiracy-theorists-like-qanon

Anonymous ID: f16021 Dec. 28, 2020, 9:24 p.m. No.12218841   🗄️.is 🔗kun

The enemy changes their names for a reason. And they invent fictional names for news stories all the time. And there's really only one good reason for them to do so over and over again, so relentlessly and insidiously. Think symbols. Then expand.

Anonymous ID: f16021 Dec. 28, 2020, 9:38 p.m. No.12218987   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8997

I just listened to Biden whine about how he's not receiving sufficient intelligence during the transition. He suggests Trump is "irresponsible" for not providing better access to this highly classified sensitive information.

 

Call me crazy for asking, but does it seem like Trump is planning on vacating the WH to any of you? And does it sound like Biden and the MSM are freaking out about that as though they won't have the power they want to do much about it?

Anonymous ID: f16021 Dec. 28, 2020, 9:49 p.m. No.12219072   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12219030

Why does Twitter have to now continually remind us within every Trump tweet that Election officials have certified Joe Biden. I mean, if it's such a certainty, why are they bothering to do this? Is it only because almost all of America knows now that Biden didn't really win? Why does that matter if the Electoral College has certified Biden anyhow? And by the way, why is it Twitter's responsibility to do anything about what America thinks? I thought Twitter was just a platform, not a news business without any editorial function.