introduction it ’ s the birthrates. what are your wishes? a vote for a radical candidate that opposes your values and incites agitation or anxiety in your own people works far more in your favour than a vote for a milquetoast political candidate that has no ability or wish to enact radical change. the us is torn into many factions by its second amendment, along state, social, cultural and, most importantly, racial lines. they are also one of the strongest groups, with high fertility, high in group preference and a will to conquer. no, but the next person to attack could be, so a healthy scepticism is a good thing. those who are not ethnically and culturally european. the people who are to blame most are ourselves, european men. accept death, embrace infamy, achieve victory numbers aren ’ t everything in 2019, we currently have the largest number of people of our race in history (between 760-980million depending on definitions), yet we are losing even our smallest towns to ethnic replacement. depending on the definition, sure. did they perceive us any differently after the attack than they did before?

no. few parents, regardless of circumstance, will willing risk the lives of their children, no matter the economic incentives. monotonous repetition of immigration facts and statistics will simply bore the masses, and drive the people away from the stale and uninspired speakers that propagate them. but the aftershock from my actions will ripple for years to come, driving political and social discourse, creating the atmosphere or fear and change that is required. though wise men at their end know dark is right, because their words had forked no lightning they do not go gentle into that good night. unsurprisingly ethno-nationalists and nationalists seek employment in areas that serve their nations and community.

>few parents, regardless of circumstance, will willing risk the lives of their children, no matter the economic incentives.