2 nuggets from late laste bread, one's already in notables but worth relinking:
>>1222879 (prev.) Great VetAnon PepTalk… "Take your seats, please. The show is about to begin."
>>1223128 Medicinal cannibalism (yeouch)
>>1223153 thanks for sharing, very interesting…
There's a story i never shared here, but should have, dating from my years post-9/11, on and off researching it.
Circa 2003/2004, maybe around the peak of obvious disinfo campaigns (lasers/holograms/all sorta stuff).
What i stumbled on was the short testimony of a researcher who had noticed that, digging on the JFK researchers, he found one of the best ones to have stepped out of the limelight early on, and had the opportunity to meet him and ask him why… (don't remember either's name, so not sure where i could look it up)
The answer was simple but very telling: everyone was getting lost in the small details - getting screwed with the Micro details, while the Macro big picture couldn't be more obvious to anyone - and yet, endlessly distracted and occupied with arguments and counterarguments, facts and counterfacts, nothing could quite take hold.
One obvious comparison was JFK ballistics/911 engineering: how many hours spent analyzing, debating, calling on experts, who contradict other experts, and on and on and on…
Just as the real, hard, glaring questions of interpretation regarding the JFK event were successfully evacuated by building the "conspiracy theorist" narrative on one hand, and enmeshing anyone who got into it in intricate details, inconsistencies and unprovable interpretations, while the killers were just sitting around laughing, 9/11 truth movement was funneled into all sorts of dead-ends, in-fights, engineering debates, etc.
Of course that's not to say it's not a good thing to get into the details, but the lesson i found was that as civilians with only access to the web and our minds, we put on ourselves a burden of proof that simply cannot be attained.
But more importantly, that doesn't need to be attained: we were duped into thinking we have to reach that goal to win, but as we try, the big picture laughs it away, comfortably sitting on everyone's face.
This plan/Q project, however, is helping us navigate this difficult equilibrium between micro/macro.
Small, crucial details, but also the 40,000ft. view…
it's a bit sad/cringe, indeed… here we are trying to tell newfags not to to fall for the concernfags and moralefuckers, and Q bites!
ohwell, we all do once in a while, fair enough. The answer was good, as usual
oh, those were quite different, to be sure.
it's more annoyance at their apparent success at building up a fake facade of disgruntled Qanons/diverting the narrative than at Q responding - and when he does, it's for the benefit of all, not just who was replied to, obviously
oh, also. Not sure when the codename was adopted, so if pre-2008 it might be serendipitous (but maybe not, if she was supposed to have had Bill's spot, too):
>EVERGREEN…
with envy.
>>1223377 tripldubz chkd
> Dec 11 2017 13:43:38 (EST) Anonymous ID: 26b2f6 74029
> Maybe all (((these))) wives are there own high priestess cult…that where we’ll see the symbolism…the "slip ups"
>Dec 11 2017 13:45:13 (EST) Q !ITPb.qbhqo ID: 4a55e6 74050
>>>74029
good
>"follow the wives/husbands"
dig
>all the agencies were just absolute cesspools of nepotism, and pretty much everybody advanced by playing leap-frog along with a spouse through the system. Use your connections to get your wife a better slot somewhere in the alphabet soup, then she does the same for you. A few detours on the way to congressional staffs, or well connected private law and media firms, can be part of the track as well.
ya think? always was sure he's a spook, but could never tell who/what team was going on there, exactly…
>not sure why Q's trip code would bring up this list…
because Q has worldwide reach and audience and booksellers want to sell books