This anon has read a fair few of Mathis' papers and entered into email correspondence where certain building blocks of his were refuted. Miles then threw a massive strop, claiming to be of superior intellect. He doesn't want to debate, he wants to orate. He wants followers who will revere his every word and not dispute the inconsistencies. He believes he's the smartest man in the room. By that I mean any room, any where in time and space.
This is not to say that his work is rubbish. His papers on Manson, Lennon and Lincoln are a revelation. Lookout for the stuff on the Phoneticians. Mindblowing (although written by a Miles acolyte). Miles' papers are written in such a way as to make you think he is an intellectual heavyweight and you are not worthy. You are supposed to come out of the experience believing you are inferior. Which is precisely why I tried to debate him.
Is he a clown project? Possible. He rubbishes Stephen King as a clown, on the basis that he doesn't have enough time in the day to write as much as he has, whilst at the same time producing a huge output himself. He describes how a fake guru might behave, then behaves this way himself. Finally, there is one paper where he claims that Q is a clown op and you the reader should reject Q and follow Miles instead.
Make up your own mind. Kek.