>>12236937
baker has nothing to do with bans stupid.
sauce would be nice. or at least the rest of the tweet for some context.
if you're gonna ask anons to look at something. provide as much info as you can, other wise figure it out for yourself. anons arent your personal google search.
i dont think that. even if you're B& you can get sauce or screencap without signing in. OP shares half a Q+ post with no sauce and asks anons to decode it so he has content for his next blog post. epic newfaggotry.