Anonymous ID: f1acb2 Dec. 30, 2020, 7:43 a.m. No.12237327   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

At 3:52, this fella wants you to think that WL is "shifting" or "morphing" along with the geopolitical landscape in order to best serve the public. Question for people who are still on the "fence" re: Assange and WL. How does his statement(s) in this video marry up with Q's claims? Why would Assange feel the need to "inform the public" that WL is going to be morphing/changing along with the geopolitical landscape if Q's statement is correct, and WL is no longer in his hands; perhaps even knowing it is in the bad guys' hands. Think about the drops again.

 

In order:

 

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 267e20 No.1918277 πŸ“

Jun 26 2018 22:10:09 (EST)

Desperate agencies do stupid things.

Dead cat bounce.

You may have the site but we have the source.

https://mobile.twitter.com/wikileaks/status/1011441579565953025πŸ“

Panic is good.

Panic is right.

July 2018 - the month the world discovered the TRUTH.

Conspiracy no more.

Time to FEED.

Q

 

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI No.139 πŸ“

Aug 11 2018 12:12:31 (EST)

These people are stupid!

https://www.cohenmilsteinprocessserver.comπŸ“

"Never Interfere With an Enemy While He’s in the Process of Destroying Himself."

Discovery.

http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/400882-wikileaks-says-senate-panel-requested-assange-testimony-in-russia-probeπŸ“

Do you believe in coincidences?

We have the source.

Q

 

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 6661a0 No.6138770 πŸ“

Apr 11 2019 13:34:08 (EST)

If we are merely a LARP asking questions on the Chans, why are we being attacked daily by some of the world's biggest media co's, social media co's deliberately applying censorship/banning, shills paid/inserted to disrupt (media matters), blue checkmark coordinated attacks, etc.?

All for a 'conspiracy' on the Chans?

All for a 'LARP'?

Why is there a constant flow of disinformation being pushed re: Q?

Example:

Disinformation push re: Mueller is a white hat.

FAKE & FALSE narrative.

Think BLOCKADE.

When you can't attack the information directly, you attack the source, if that fails, you 'create false misleading information' to discredit knowing 'select' 'unaware' followers would not take the time to self-corroborate the claims (same vehicle/tactics used by FAKE NEWS media).

Logical thinking always wins.

Nothing can stop what is coming.

As the target(s) turn to the other side, the attacks will intensify.

We have the source.

Q