Anonymous ID: ff4604 Dec. 30, 2020, 10:10 a.m. No.12238876   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8932

4881

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 10/17/2020 12:36:26 ID: f457dc

Archive Bread/Post Links: 11117973 / 11118631

Direct Link: 11118631

https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746

There is 'Q'. 1

There are 'Anons'. 2

There is no 'Qanon'. 3

Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?

DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?

Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].

You are correct, CJ.

Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]

Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?

Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.

Q

Anonymous ID: ff4604 Dec. 30, 2020, 10:34 a.m. No.12239173   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9207

>>12239117

I have a question. Why are YOU so triggered over praise given to others?

 

"Nobody can competently answer"

 

This is a deceptive standard because you're tacitly declaring yourself to be the world's sole judge over whether the information is 'competent'.

 

It's not anyone's job to convince you, you narcissistic brainlet.

 

You're just an Anon kvetching over patriots being praised for the incredible job they have successfully done.

 

You're not the world's judge, STFU,