>>12237427 (pb)
you kept up saying 'hypocrite' but I could not figure out why.
maybe you could explain yourself cause I'm kind of curious what you were on about?
I suspect you were just being a cowardly baiter, but I'll give you one more opportunity.
what exactly did you mean?
you answered me having no involvment just to try to make me feel bad.
how does that make you feel?
what battle? I'm doing research on why that person was trying to suggest that everyone going on Wednesday is a coward unless they are armed?
PS: I did answer in that bread but upon review I thought 'gee, that's an odd person, I shall investigate and see if said individual still lurks and see if they will rationally explain.'
all that stuff you said, it's made up and you're just imagining who I am and why I am here, and have no real information about me so whatever you claim about me is not verifiable and probably false.
toots and be well, you really should get back there.
no he isn't and neither are you.
>Anjel