>Baker here, Anons is this notable?
was notable a few days back, but not well labeled. mislabeled here too.
Better title:
leaked presentation to pentagon arguing that VIRUSES (bioweapons) should be used to vaccinate against religious behavior
>as I believe, been de-bunked.
I have read the debunks. No one thinks it's Bill Gates, but debunk says it not Bill Gates. (it's not bill gates = strawman) Debunks don't debunk any content or even that it's a pentagon setting.
>>12241248 meant for >>12241185