Anonymous ID: 72cdc8 Dec. 30, 2020, 7:14 p.m. No.12245519   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5625

>>12245430 lb

The drop was aimed at the paytriots falsely attributing the term "qanons" to random anons that come here.

Q wanted to be blunt when he mentioned to the ecelebs attaching their names to the movement that they're brainlets and that that's not how the naming convention works.

 

You absolutely do not get to come here and convince normies that we have't always dubbed random contributions to our research as random topicanon (* being the topic being discussed).

We've been doing this for much longer than the month you've been hanging out here.

 

Now go slide something else, faggot.

Anonymous ID: 72cdc8 Dec. 30, 2020, 7:29 p.m. No.12245732   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12245625

I specifically attacked the message.

I said you're wrong and you're misinterpreting things.

 

Q does not get to decide what we call them.

We've had memes galore, websites, blog posts, video titles and so much more plastered with "Qanon" since December 2017, anon. What, is qanon.pub now comped because you can't comprehend what you read?

 

"We" are anons. You are clearly just a newfag. Yes, we get to say "we" when we know you're not anon and are clearly new here.

 

>Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.

I don't care.

We labeled Q as Qanon or Q Clearance Patriot from the very beginning. Just because they are running spin and stealing our linguistic tools DOES NOT mean we should abandon them, take down all of the decorations in our homes, burn our books and cower and put in limitless effort to correct normies that say the wrong words.

 

You're spinning on a wheel like a rabbit.

I came here for quite some time, day after day, correcting ecelebs when they called us "Qanons". It was relieving when Q finally backed that position up.

 

Again, you're just new.