So a sportsball guy intentionally scored exactly 42 points in a competitive, officiated, professional contest in order to pass you a message, Anon? And 'Wingman' posted at exactly the right time to make you think that 10+10+12 = 42, even though you are in error?
This is Declas.
"You are recorded discussing Justice Scalia’s successor before date of his sudden death."
Tarmac meeting [SC/LL deal AS 187].
Q
Install 'on team' SC justiceslegal win(s) across spectrum of challengers (AS 187)
Q
AS 187 / Clown Black (Brennan).
Q
>what I would consider crazy, or if they are deliberately playing at disinformation.
I've been gentle thinking that 'red strings' are imitations and that the anons making them genuinely think they are contributing. I may be wrong, of course.
I do suspect an effort has been made to use 'decodes' and gematria in order to turn others away from the Q source material. I'm still not sure about 'red strings' anons.
He is an educated lawyer with substantial assets and much at risk. He's in the same boat the revolutionaries were in around 1775. They risked it all
and bet their fortunes on winning.
I doubt he would be doing this without solid information. He understands libel law as well as the penalties involved for crossing the line.
His info is, or was, surely classified at some level. The fact that he is making it public I take to mean that it has already been shown to a Grand Jury.
Military tactics frequently employ feints and diversions. Anon can see a benefit to Durham being used in this way.
I can't say that is his role, however, just that it is plausible.
We see some anons arrive here and criticize 'the plan' because they see no MSM confirmation of 'the plan'. These anons proclaim 'There has been nothing done' because they were apparently expecting the MSM to report from a neutral perspective with honest reporting.
[They] did a very good job of convincing even suitably skeptical anons that the MSM is reality.
That's why it is called 'programming', Anon.
I think it is telling that this effort was called 'The Great Awakening'. That perfectly describes the objectives that are required. It's not enough to arrest some politicians - the public would go back to sleep. This effort required educating and informing millions of supporters and raising awareness of the stakes before reaching a more active phase.
Crimes against Children = common denominator [no matter political affiliation][mass pop awakening].
Have faith in Humanity.
Q
Sometimes you can't TELL the public the truth.
YOU MUST SHOW THEM.
ONLY THEN WILL PEOPLE FIND THE WILL TO CHANGE.
Crimes against children unite all humanity [cross party lines]?
Difficult truths.
Q
>the thing insists that an inanimate board has a consensus.
The thing seems to think anons are blindly seeking a leader or rely on faith in an individual. These people anthropomorphize writing signed with a Q for no reason.
The board is composed of anons who discuss information. No more, no less. Anyone seeking to assign motives to anons has an agenda.
You need another Task Force Smith?