>>12250575

Weaponized autism is the infantry rifle of information warfare. For every hundred rounds fired, about two of them will actually score some kind of a hit.

It makes for good covering, or even suppressing fire at times, though.

Remember, it's not the bullet with a name on it that the target need worry about. It's the one addressed "to whom it may concern "

Being a bit more candid, however, I think some of the "red string" posts are weird attempts at fitting in by people who don't really understand how real 'genius level pattern recognition' works. Kind of like how there are some who go all gematria on everything and then play math games to add, subtract, and divide numbers arbitratily until they get some kind of answer argued to be meaningful.

I can't tell if those people are genuinely what I would consider crazy, or if they are deliberately playing at disinformation.

That's not to say every numerical play is disinfo - just that when someone is going more than about two math operations to show a connection, they are lacking much in the way of reason to do so.

>>12250677

As someone who saw this conflict coming nearly two decades, ago - I don't really see how Q plays into the "globalist"/cabal plan. It makes no sense from that perspective. What was Q doing other than building up an expectation for a better tomorrow and a sentiment opposed to said cabal?

Let's puzzle out what would have occurred if Q hadn't been around. The proverbial cabal would benefit from using sleeper agents to attack not Trump, but the democrats during impeachment hearings and other such things to try and provoke those of us who have been convinced militancy will be necessary off the sidelines and into the fray.

Let's ask what it was Q "stopped" us from doing. To that, I can come up with few answers. There is no task I can conceive of - other than premature acts of violence - that would have been done. We can argue about whether or not some things were researched on - but it appeared to me that Q amplified discussion of political, social, and other issues and research into them. There are now, both for reasons including Q and independent of Q, far more people paying attention to the affairs of government than ever before.

So… How does that benefit "the cabal?"

It doesn't. None of it does.

Imagine what would have been without Q. We would still have all of the economic instability. We would still have covid and the great reset. We would still have tech censorship.

Q was not about preventing these things from happening, but about empowering us to overcome them and to let it be known that there are others who knew this was coming and that they have plans to keep it from turning into a brutal hellscape.

>>12250747

I am a bit more cynical and am of the opinion that quite a bit of it is deliberate attempts to confuse people.

When it comes to 'decodes' - I look for something that is reasonably intelligible. Every 'code' can produce accurate results so long as you have the key to decoding. Signal flags on a ship, for example, have specific meanings and times when they are flown because they lose their purpose when there is no standard.

If someone comes and posts red string bouncing off of big ben and the eifel tower to show that Trump is signalling 17…. I'll say that it's highly unlikely to mean anything.

But if someone could show me that, say, the time Trump posts regularly synchs up with a Q post number in terms of content or missing/added letters - then I would say there may very well be meaning behind it. It's a method of expanding context or signalling that could be somewhat accurately used and not just by Trump.

For example, I had my suspicion that I have something of a history with Q - for reasons beyond the scope of the forum. This year, Q posted the oath of service on my birthday. So. Confirmation bias being what it is - I can't give an unbiased view. But it was one of those 'no coincidence moments.'

I also half expect to find out my dad never died and took up his role as Q or something equally ridiculous at this point. The similarity between the two's methods and mannerisms is striking.

So… Yeah. Imagine growing up with Q as your Dad, just pretending to be a normie boomer except for a few times where the mask slips and he says weird stuff that makes too much sense as time goes on.