Oh, no the fuck you don't. No, no, no, no. You people get to ride this one out. This board has spent the last month bloviating over Lin and the truth is, he either is 100% right, or playing disinfo games. So, sorry, but you don't get to simply say "OK, that crossed the line for me." Lin is here to stay, for a while longer at least, until his part is done. I called it yesterday, though. It's starting to look like his 15 minutes is just about up, regardless.
>Not much has changed since then except now our President has the Lord of Hosts with him
What does this even mean, anon? Are you saying Jesus wasn't ready to save the Republic when JFK was President? Do you mean that Reagan was godly enough to survive assassination attempt, but not fix the shitshow in DC?
I think that when you step back and put things into a realistic perspective of an everlasting battle of good and evil, then you realize the reason it took us so long to get anything real done is because it took the people this long to wake to the reality that our Republic has been under attack since the beginning. I think that explanation is much more likely than God taking his time to charge up the liberty defibrillator.
How so?
He's either 100% right, or playing disinfo games. He doesn't have to knowingly be playing those games, either. Sometimes, folks are given a script. Even if he's telling 90% the truth, the other 10% is disinfo. My statement is accurate. I don't address nuance because we can't know how much would/would not be truth v lies. Lin is claiming carnal knowledge, which hardly any anon here, or on twitter, could possibly do.
Over a month's worth of Lin Wood tweets as notables, sometimes several in a single bread, every few hours, would imply the board as a whole disagrees with your statement. I never said he wasn't part of the plan, or had a role to play, etc. What I am saying is that a sizable chunk of anons quite literally turned to him in a very similar manner as they were looking to Q.
The consensus isn't imaginary at all.
>that it has already been shown to a Grand Jury
I would most certainly it had been already. Otherwise, this is going to take much longer than anyone anticipated.
Think of it from another angle, and perhaps I'm trying to contextualize Ron Coleman and "The Election Wizard's" sentiment/statement a little, here. Perhaps what they are taking issue with is Lin's accusation seems to be at odds with Q's own statements re: Scalia. It's our anon's understanding that Scalia fell victim to getting Clinton'd because that's what's apparently in the WL emails, and Q's own account of the Tarmac meeting with LL. Nowhere in either of these sources is Roberts mentioned.
https://qanon.pub/?q=tarmac
Sure. If I write a book report and base my sources in information that I had no clue to be inaccurate or misleading, and I'm knowingly pushing disinfo? The assumption everyone here seems to be making is that Lin Wood in in the know. That means whatever gospel he is preaching on his twitter account should be based on verifiable info. Here's the problem:
It isn't. At least not from what he's able to show us.
Lin could be 100% correct. Lin could also be playing a role where he's not necessarily putting the full truth out there. You bringing Jesus into the argument has nothing to do with whether or not Lin Wood is making factual statements. Noisy instrument? Sure. 100% factually based statements? Yeah; nah. We can't know that anyway, and I'm not much for taking someone's word for anything after the past 3 years of learning that sources and proof are of utmost importance.
That's the truth.
Poor girl. There's no telling what all they did to her.
I don't mean to be so harsh on folks like Lin, but their incessant ramblings with zero proof/backing isn't contributing anything to making a solid case to the normies. It goes back to "trusting yourself" instead of putting all your eggs in someone else's (un-provable) basket. Until his claims actually pan out in the public eye, he's the Jimmy Swaggart of e-celebs, right now. That's what I'm getting at.