Anonymous ID: 3acfa1 Dec. 31, 2020, 7:48 a.m. No.12252173   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2192 >>2203 >>2262 >>2263 >>2290 >>2622 >>2662 >>2799

>>12252102

lawfag must step in with a caution

the fact that wood is a top defamation lawyer cuts both ways

he knows he can say almost anything about a public figure if he has just one anon source or any kind or quality and never get sued successfully an never has to reveal source (attorney cleitn and or journalist priv)

SO what if this is just a psyop to prove that the defamation laws are FUBAR

POTUS has said he wants it changed

just sayin

i hope wood IS telling the truth but seems too good to be true

Anonymous ID: 3acfa1 Dec. 31, 2020, 7:53 a.m. No.12252223   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2266

>>12252129

lawfag here

liability for defamation of a PUBLIC fiigure requires "actual malice" by the defendant

this is a VERY high bar for plaintiffs esp when they cannot access sources cuz of muh privilage

OR he has some loony bin telling him epstein alive and he goes with it

hes insulated unless they prove he KNEW it was a lie - again very tough

Anonymous ID: 3acfa1 Dec. 31, 2020, 7:55 a.m. No.12252247   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12252129

lawfag here

liability for defamation of a PUBLIC fiigure requires "actual malice" by the defendant

this is a VERY high bar for plaintiffs esp when they cannot access sources cuz of muh privilage

OR he has some loony bin telling him epstein alive and he goes with it

hes insulated unless they prove he KNEW it was a lie - again very tough

>>12252133

shit like this is why the board rejected beaner

Anonymous ID: 3acfa1 Dec. 31, 2020, 8:01 a.m. No.12252314   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12252262

yea almost that bad

"news" is the worst offender just read their Bullshit every day

BUT remember very few can accept the cost of being sued by public figures ($$$) and that is a major disincentive for most

lin wood dont care

Anonymous ID: 3acfa1 Dec. 31, 2020, 8:03 a.m. No.12252344   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12252263

cuz i have red and tiped so fuking much in my daily grind to i can bear it any moar takes energy i dont have

plus my eyesight is weak

i cud just not post

Anonymous ID: 3acfa1 Dec. 31, 2020, 8:06 a.m. No.12252370   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2476

>>12252266

of course the simple answer is yes you have whatever power the specific doc gives - if it includes healthcare decision yes

however we are no longer a nation of law so its sadly more complex than that

they can and will fuck you around

then you could get in trouble too if sumpin happens and they blame you

(note the vaccine makes have immunity not you)

welcome to hell

Anonymous ID: 3acfa1 Dec. 31, 2020, 8:27 a.m. No.12252628   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12252350

if potus cant supply water porta-toilets and security then patriots should not be invited to town

really he knows how to be a good host so these things should be covered imo