Q#4881

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 10/17/2020 12:36:26

https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746

There is 'Q'. 1

There are 'Anons'. 2

There is no 'Qanon'. 3

Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?

DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?

Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].

You are correct, CJ.

Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]

Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?

Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.

Q

>>12257006

The crumbs did paint the picture soon after that drop.

wtf r u smokin

>>12256949

Oh no that sucks.

Makes the "GOP Rep elect hearing word on the street that Mitch and Pelosi are 'cooking up a way to block objections'" look like fake news doesn't it?

Kek

>>12257063

Projection.

Must suck to really self perceive yourself as having been a fake news bootlicker your entire life doesn't it?

Kek!