contd from last bread… Phonefagging so excuse me for any typos.

C before D.

Centralized before Decentralized finance.

Yes, it's about crypto and not the coins themselves, but the system around it. Once you look into how DeFi works, you'll see that it will bring the central banks cabal down to their knees faster than Moloch unbuckling his belt.

DeFi will remove any lending institutions in the middle by definition.

DeFi incentivezes Trust, rather than Deception.

It's transparent, yet semi-anonymous. Not fully.

System-wide manipulation is much more difficult to do.

We will finally be free from the century-long scam that is FIAT-backed currency.

Some arguments against DeFi are valid but many aren't. It's as if they haven't looked into it at all. Simply trying to regurgitate what others told them about it. Sounds familiar?

So why now? I believe tracking criminals will definitely be more difficult but they're hiding behind the shadows now anyway. It's like the Gun control. Bad guys are breaking the laws now and they always will. It's the People who suffer when kept away from useful technologies. But after mapping the network and bringing down the big portion of the cabal, the benefit (giving power back to the people) will outweigh the cost(difficulty tracking criminal activities).

Whether we want it or not crypto is here to stay and DeFi is coming bigly.

Nothing can stop what is coming. NOTHING.

>>12266645

>>12266645

>>12266645

anon, I usually don't side with fags who post allcaps and not address the actual topic st hand, but to me, I'm not gonna have to side with 1142c8.

What's USD backed by? Can we physically touch most of the wealth we have? Did we print so much that we can't even have the paper money equivalent to what is circulating in the market?

I believe Gold-backed currency is sound, but many things you mention today against crypto apply to our today's currency.

re:internet

If the internet goes down, people with today's currency are way more fucked than thosebeith gold or crypto.

>>12266712

Anon, I see that your train of thought is sound. It's just that you're a bit misinformed about cryptocurrency. You'll see. Not saying it's perfect and it has its flaws. But "relying on sone computing" is not the language I would use to characterize the problem.

>>12266739

*I'm gonna have to side with

>>12266793

Yea, with you there.

>>12266782

Not replying to 1142c8 but to all anons

This is the first time I observed where seemingly reasonable are less informed than the allcapsfag. Remember I said this. Think for yourself and research it yourself.

>>12266872

care to elaborate? I would like to learn that I'm wrong and grow further as a person. If you are truly an anon, you'll use this opportunity to raise me up to your level of understanding. I do not fear you if you're a person of authority, yet lack the character to bring one of his anons along

Anons need to see the merit of DeFi, not necessarily BTC. Not the same.