>>12267830 pb

That would be you.

If you are coming here to mock us. what's the payoff?

If you want to deal with facts / reality instead of cartoons placed in your head by Propaganda, we're here.

But no, you play the offended one,

Mirroring per the usual

All you do is mock, what do you expect back?

If you want to deal in Facts, Citations, Real Events, the study of actual corruption, we're here for that

But you can't take the heat of reality

And you must repress your own state of delusion, to yourself?

Is that why you see us, as though through a mirror?

Because you are truly ignorant of your own guilt?

>>12267827

dude is just baiting you.

Either that or you're a team

>>12267936

with that many people who gonna be there to arrest.

First check the premise

Are you sure POTUS would have no porta potties for us?

Or is that a wet dream for the THUGS

We can always throw our shit at them, if it came to that,

They'd be so scared of "Covid" they might leave us alone

>>12267854

He's working for some agency.

I doubt he was even really locked up.

That move is part of their game.

They did it with Manson

It's part of the Propaganda apparatus

They want "Q" to be a jailbird and to have a flowery public personae for the National Enquirer crowd

>>12267854

Oustin is an ACTOR

Weather he's really mentally ill or not is another question; Think "AJ"

Why is there no blood pumping out of this man's arm?

Was there a tourniquette already? Or did Kyle disturb a ff simulation?

And they just ran with it?

Maybe they chased him because they just thought he was part of the "scene" / "school play?"

>>12268033

He supposedly left the Pentagon recently; fired by POTUS DJT

Was in some planning group in the bowels of the Pentagon for all these years.

He and Madaline Albright and few others were all made to leave, very recently.

I couldn't believe

1. Dudes still alive

2. He was still working at the Pentagon

The things you find out.

What was his SS name?

Mitra or Midas?

>>12268095

"Then I guess it comes down to what statements are associated with which source?"

No, I think it is how the whole picture is done?

The more verifiable data points incorporated in the story, the greater the stability of the narrative.

The liar's narrative runs into contradictions / illogicality; forces a trance state - repression / suspension of disbelief.

The more discordant data points added the greater the effort to repress the info, which drives the subject deeper into a delusional trance.