Anonymous ID: 90ba1a Jan. 1, 2021, 9:49 a.m. No.12268421   🗄️.is 🔗kun

https://www.coloradoindependent.com/2015/12/31/colorados-new-voting-machine-mandates-irk-cash-strapped-counties/

 

"Voting equipment across Colorado’s 64 counties will have to be replaced in the next two years in order to comply with requirements of a 2009 state law. And Secretary of State Wayne Williams just designated one company, Dominion Voting Systems, as the sole vendor for all the needed gear."

(Talks about post election audits but with Dominion, there would be no way to validate an audit)

 

Below: Look who got Dominion between 2017 and 2019? How many of these states allegedly went for Biden? (I think they all did) What a coincidence?

https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamandrzejewski/2020/12/08/dominion-voting-systems-received-120-million-from-19-states-and-133-local-governments-to-provide-election-services-2017-2019/?sh=76c29baf620f

 

"….Dominion Voting Systems is the second largest vendor in the non-transparent and entrenched election system industry where three vendors control 88-percent of the market.

Recent Dominion contracts with major counties and cities across America set service agreements for years or even decades—helping lock-in the company’s dominant market position and prevent competition. ….

 

I want to dispel the idea that just because a state doesn't have all Dominion, doesn't mean Dominion cannot be used to affect state wide elections, or districts where it is in some precincts. Down ballot races are also very important and maybe you can "allow" one GOP or Rhino through to make the claim while affecting a whole slew of races elsewhere. The last article kinda looks like trying to dominate the market and the "fix."