Anonymous ID: 23afb2 Jan. 1, 2021, 3:54 p.m. No.12273308   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3319 >>3344 >>3381 >>3414 >>3487 >>3506 >>3573 >>3621 >>3634 >>3665

Q#4881

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 10/17/2020 12:36:26

https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746

There is 'Q'. 1

There are 'Anons'. 2

There is no 'Qanon'. 3

Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?

DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?

Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].

You are correct, CJ.

Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]

Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?

Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.

Q

Anonymous ID: 23afb2 Jan. 1, 2021, 4:02 p.m. No.12273421   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Twitter: "Election officials have certified Joe Biden as the winner"

 

No they didn't. Projections of fake news are not 'official' source.