Even Gorka is calling out Wood.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. No one is justified believing Wood without evidence. The claims he is making are just that - claims. Demand evidence before belief. Or as astute anons say, "sauce or GTFO"
Thank you anons for reminding me that what Gorka says doesn't mean a fucking thing.
He's a douche.
Buy my point, which you failed to address, still stands.
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. No one is justified believing Wood without evidence. The claims he is making are just that - claims. Demand evidence before belief. Or as astute anons say, "sauce or GTFO"
He could also be insane.
He could also be telling the truth. The point is that we need evidence before we are justified believing him.
And if you haven't figured it out yet, I'm trying to give you fags a lesson in philosophical critical thinking 101.
The burden of proof is the obligation on a party in a dispute to provide sufficient warrant for their position.
Lin Wood HAS NOT PROVIDED ANY EVIDENCE whatsoever for his claims.
He might in the future. But until then, we are not justified believing his claims.
SO SAUCE OR GTFO