>>12276973 lb

>>12277534 (I, in response to above) lb

>>12277545 lb

Negative.

The child of Ham and his Cainish wife was Canaan,

from whom were the Sidonians,

the Hittites,

the Jebusites,

the Amorites,

the Girgasites,

the Hivites,

the Arkites,

the Sinites,

the Arvadites,

the Zemarites,

and the Hamathites.

All of the above were accursed,

because Canaan had been accursed,

and they all came from Canaan's loins.

You will also note from among some of those peoples were the post flood giants,

a big clue as the pre-flood ones were the sons of Cain.

By the time Ham sowed his seed in Africa,

he had other wives descended from his two brothers.

Those were not accursed.

>>12277825

Don't Talmud.

As to my assertion,

it is deduced by elimination.

Cain's people before the flood had the giants among them,

being first wanderers with the father,

then having founded Sumer in the east of Eden after a few centuries.

The postflood giants were of Canaan.

Canaan was the son of Ham.

Ham was not of Cain.

The only parent that would have the Cainish blood would be Ham's wife,

who likely was the daughter of Lamech,

sister of Tubal-Cain,

Naamah.

Lamech's children were the generation existing when the flood struck.

>>12277694

Your doubt is correct.

It was not Noah's wife.

The other possibilities would be the son's wives.

The only one of the sons to bear giants after the flood was Ham.

Ham was not of the giants,

so it would have to have been Ham's wife.