>>122953

(From my previous post)

Anons, no one finds it the least bit curious that a search of Wikileaks shows zero results for " Todd Macklerr"? (Unless I somehow did the search wrong). Go check for yourself.

Did Q actually post that then delete it? It's not in his drops now. The only thing I could think of is if that e-mail was scrubbed before Wikileaks got the drop.

>>123008

Thank you anons! Had me worried for a minute.

>>123051

Thank you. Makes perfect sense now, I do not know how I missed that. Special thanks for not immediately assuming I was a shill.

God speed, anons!