Q#4881

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 10/17/2020 12:36:26

https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746

There is 'Q'. 1

There are 'Anons'. 2

There is no 'Qanon'. 3

Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?

DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?

Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].

You are correct, CJ.

Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]

Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?

Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.

Q

Lin Wood has just lost me as a listener with this one disgusting tweet that reveals his true colors

1. Uses 'tenure' argumentative fallacy to portray his arguments as superior to Jenna's.

1. Treats Jenna with disrespect using the same repeated name typing pattern that Lin Wood uses for fake news pundits.

1. Insults Jenna for daring to merely CHOOSE to not support Lin Wood's statements about Pence getting excited by firing squad. All Jenna said is that she doesn't support that Tweet, she supports the Constitution and Law. Wood's reply shows he is putting his own ego above Jenna's choice to disagree with a Tweet.

Wood has been treating even allies as not to be trusted should they dare disagree with him.

Well, Lin, there comes a point when disrespecting wonderful Patriots like Jenna Ellis makes you as the person needing to admit you made a mistake. You do understand that right Lin? You mentioned being imperfect Lin. Maybe insulting Jenna by criticizing what she had no choice in, her age, is a cheap shot that you need to retract, Lin. Do you think that would be the right thing to do Lin?

>>12281605

You're overly confident in your ability to effectively use sarcasm about being overly confident. It has no impact on me.

>>12281610

Honestly I have only a finite amount of fucks to give, what I typed is it. If others see it, and they wish to speak, good. This isn't about me.

>>12281617

What part is it, that you say he doesn't know but somehow you do?

>>12281619

Didn't Q also drop about not all anons are authentic? You typing as an anon isn't a guarantee you're authentic.

>>12281634

I think you're projecting your own hurt feelings. I am just calling it as I see it. I see Lin trying to hurt Jenna's feelings as payback for daring to disagree with a tweet.

>>12281644

But they were. The truth was able to get out because Q intentionally acted as an observer of it all. That's confidence.

>>12281651

What Lin Wood said that I used as a means to choose to stop listening to him was how he insulted Jenna Ellis.

I do not accept the narrative that "Pence is a traitor"…yet. You say it like I'm supposed to just accept it because of the narrative that suddenly appeared out of nowhere attacking him 'from within'. NOT ALL ANONS ARE AUTHENTIC.

You can keep listening to Wood as 'smoking out' this or that. I will use other sources. I cannot respect Wood for how he totally disrespected Trump's own legal counsel, and doing so in a way that lacked professionalism and decorum. Your choice who you follow.

>>12281657

Nah, I will not 'hush'. I will speak my mind.

>>12281668

Your attacks on Jenna do not earn any brownie points with me.

>>12281676

Jenna already disavowed that tweet and said she made a mistake. Trump hired her as attorney KNOWING she made that tweet.

Same thing with Wood. If he apologises and recants his tweet, I'll still listen.

>>12281684

The problem with that narrative is that it encourages apathy and disassociation. This is a 'real world' movie. That means everything is on the table. All emotions, even all the ideas about the real world being a movie is on the table.

>>12281717

At some point, significant accusations DEMAND significant evidence.

>>12281731

And?

>>12281738

Seems very intentional doesn't it.

>>12281741

I am inclined to agree that there is a difference between what PEOPLE think and tell you what to believe, and what the Bible says and trusting yourself to make conclusions despite what 'men of God' tell you what to think and insult you if you disagree with one tweet they made.

>>12281742

Who are you really imagining is having those experiences right now after what you read?

>>12281829

You could still be a clown regardless of what's true about Lin Wood, or me.

One isn't related to the other.

>>12281811

>Jenna implied

No she didn't, you're IMPUTINT to Jenna that MOTIVATION.

Only Jenna can confirm that.

The way I read the tweet, and yes I read in this way KNOWING I could be wrong, is that she does not support publicly accusing people of wrongdoing WITHOUT having the evidence to back it up to show.

I also read Lin Wood's reply as accusing Jenna as somehow accusing Lin Wood of not following the constitution in that tweet, when I truly believe neither are violating it in their tweets.

Jenna isn't wrong, your characterisation of her motivations, that's what you're saying is wrong, and since your characterisation could be wrong, you can't conclude Jenna is wrong, not without more information.

It's easy to accuse accuse accuse, and trusting people will fall into line, but for me I focus also on how people treat each other, and when I see Jenna merely saying she does not support that tweet, that she is only focused on the constitution and the law, I think Lin Wood had no right to insult Jenna like that. Wood's ego is not God's ego.

>>12281843

Both Law AND the Constitution.

Constitution is one part of the overall 'Law'.

>>12281926

Yes, that is plausible, but like you said, Trump hired Jenna as his PERSONAL attorney KNOWING she made that tweet in 2012.

Trump trusts Jenna with his life in 2020.

Trump did not hire Lin Wood in 2020.

Should I trust your 2012 self or your 2020 self? I can tell you that if you had the choice to perceive me as my 2012 self or my 2020 self, I'd hope and pray you took my 2020 as the 'truer' me.

>>12282014

Feelings can convey relevant information despite not being directly relevant information.

I am not calling for 'everyone must filter Lin Wood because feelings'. I am just typing information about what I saw as I only want to speak for myself.

>>12281878

I'd rather not have to be limited in my perception of you by your arbitrary constraints.

I'd rather you be a truth telling patriot than a lying clown.

>>12282053

That isn't a convincing argument.

Jenna's statements from 2012she herself already disavowed and admitted error.

You can't condemn her forever for those statements when she herself rejected them.

Fuck me?

Nah.

>>12281705

I see Lin Wood as having insulted Jenna first.

I would NOT perceive you as insulting me if all you did was say you disagree with something I said about another person.

If you perceive mere disagreements as 'insults' then boy oh boy must you feel insulted daily by the world.

You're not God.