Anonymous ID: 79503a Jan. 2, 2021, 8:03 a.m. No.12282305   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2316 >>2319 >>2343 >>2421

Q#4881

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 10/17/2020 12:36:26

https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746

There is 'Q'. 1

There are 'Anons'. 2

There is no 'Qanon'. 3

Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?

DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?

Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].

You are correct, CJ.

Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]

Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?

Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.

Q

Anonymous ID: 79503a Jan. 2, 2021, 8:08 a.m. No.12282351   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2364

>>12282322

I NEVER SAID EMERALD SAID Q WITHER, DUMB FUCK

 

The "Trust [insert name here]" was STARTED by Q, so the 'they' Emerald is referring to are themselves referring to what was originally sourced by Q.

 

It's NOT WRONG TO SAY that Q never said to trust Rosenstein or Mueller.

 

STOP accusing me of accusing anyone by merely STATING A TRUE FACT, YOU 'DUMB FUCK'.

Anonymous ID: 79503a Jan. 2, 2021, 8:15 a.m. No.12282409   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>12282343

Your attacks are proof you care.

The question is, why do you care to suppress, insult, attack, deflect from, Q4881.

 

Oh that's right, FAKE NEWS NEEDS 'Qanon' to be a 'thing' so that they can continue to attack that instead of Q, all in order to DECEIVE THE POPULATION and keep them in the dark.

 

Cope motherfucker, you don't speak for 'everyone' to conclude nobody cares. If nobody truly cared, you'd STFU about it and let it be posted without attack.