>>12288359

I mean, all that Q meant to me was that I might not have to kill half my country to save the world from oblivion. So, up until I am actively killing people….

Anyone rationally looking at Q and the problem would understand that Q was going to be wrong. Right up until he was right.

Part of Q's posting was necessary to drive the plan and to instigate actions from the other side. Why do you think they fought so hard to run Biden? They thought they were under investigation (and very likely were).

The light will reveal who is on our side and who is not.

Wrays of light.

So. If this was all just a fun larp or some kind of weird disinfo routine that failed… I go back to the old plan of shooting people until we run out of problems coming from them.

It's as simple as that.

>>12288461

To be fair, we are dealing with a conflict of law. There is one side which is claiming that the law as written is the law. There is another side which is saying that the law as determined is the law.

One allows you yo declare the seated officials of the law as rogue. The other allows the seated officials to make up up the law on the spur of the moment.

If the law enforcement institutions side with the law as determined, then those who believe in the law as written are considered seditious and treasonous. At which point, a fight for the survival of the concept of written and constrained law must take place, or it will die.

Quite possibly forever.