Anonymous ID: a76a4e April 28, 2018, 8:12 p.m. No.1229412   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9431 >>9435

>>1229391

Can you not read? That was the post the TripCode Q responded to. Either it was a black

hat taunting and being responded to, or it was Q making a mistake and not logging in before posting.

Those are the two working trains of thought right now. I do not know which is correct (if either)

but I tend to go with the black hat and response theory.

Anonymous ID: a76a4e April 28, 2018, 8:15 p.m. No.1229477   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9538

>>1229435

OK, newfag. Here's some honest and real advice. Go to qanon.pub before asking about Q posts.

It is automatically updated within about 10 minutes of any Q post. It will show the post and

any predecessors. If you ask stupid questions on 8 chan, expect anons to say, "That's a stupid

question." You asked a newfag question rather than check it yourself, which is easy to do.

 

The bread is there for a reason. You really should read it on occasion.

Anonymous ID: a76a4e April 28, 2018, 8:22 p.m. No.1229577   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1229538

I actually expected anons to tell me to fuck off with my response, which was meant in exactly

the way you interpreted it. Thanks, OldFag.

Oh… My "gender of choice" is "anonymous." I'm famous here. Just ctrl-f it, and you'll see my posts

all over the place.

Anonymous ID: a76a4e April 28, 2018, 8:31 p.m. No.1229698   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9963

>>1228489

>>1228588

Three working theories for the above posts:

  1. Black hat taunting; Q replying with his own taunt.

  2. Q posting without his trip code. Q Tripcode pointing out the post for general consumption.

  3. White hat taunting unknown black hat upthread, and Q piling on/acknowledging the message.

 

Any others?