Anonymous ID: 5d85f8 Jan. 3, 2021, 5:15 p.m. No.12301911   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1961 >>2063

>>12301624

>baker verification is just another layer of cancer

Unsubstantiated refutation of the idea

 

>and it does not eliminate the possibility of "shills" baking

No, but it does let Anons choose who's bake they stay in

 

>so it doesnt solve the problem

How so? - It gives us a clear signal of reputation without doxing the baker

 

>and it brings with it a lot of new problems

Like what exactly - your inability to shit up the catalog with split breads?

 

>so, I would say

Who cares what you say?

 

>its not a good strat

Well thanks for sharing your opinion. Maybe if you could string together a coherent argument I would not just assume you are a clown and part of the problem.

Anonymous ID: 5d85f8 Jan. 3, 2021, 5:23 p.m. No.12302023   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2049

>>12301961

You are either stupid or deliberately distorting the meaning. Another strike against you.

Noone needs an ID to enter. They just advertise their good works by way of a tripcode.

And like a "Made in China" logo I can as a consumer elect not to purchase that loaf.

 

Seems to be good enough for Q.