A ID: 4ceeb3 Jan. 4, 2021, 1:53 a.m. No.12307651   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7664 >>7676 >>7703

>>12307549

 

 

Patriot Anons

Q team - Theory about MD5 string converter to hash

Is the key part of the string (stringer)

Used the string to find the key

Many of the Q drops says (stringer) string is short for stringer & stringer of keys or stringer of many keys to unlock the map

How to reverse MD5 to get the original string <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

stackoverflow.com/questions/12287704/ddg#12287716

No, that's not really possible, as

there can be more than one string giving the same MD5 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

it was designed to be hard to "reverse"

The goal of the MD5 and its family of hashing functions is

to get short "extracts" from long string

to make it hard to guess where they come from

to make it hard to find collisions, that is other words having the same hash (which is a very similar exigence as the second one)

Think that you can get the MD5 of any string, even very long. And the MD5 is only 16 bytes long (32 if you write it in hexa to store or distribute it more easily). If you could reverse them, you'd have a magical compacting scheme.

This being said, as there aren't so many short strings (passwords…) used in the world, you can test them from a dictionary (that's called "brute force attack") or even google for your MD5. If the word is common and wasn't salted, you have a reasonable chance to succeed…

–Denys Séguret

A ID: 4ceeb3 Jan. 4, 2021, 2:04 a.m. No.12307706   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12307676 - 2 drops here..think the first might relate?

 

 

Patriot Anons

Q team - Well Dang possible theory

The one that says check code line 1183 (Might have one of the stringers keys)