Anonymous ID: b655a5 April 28, 2018, 11:01 p.m. No.1231123   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1196 >>1447

You know, I was just thinking,. Is it possible there have been many 'plants' in the POTUS admin. Bear with me for a minute. I'm not talking about patriots like General Flynn. BUT, look at what happened with Steve Bannon. After the POTUS was elected, he basically claimed he was responsible for the POTUS getting elected. SHORTLY, after, him and the president had a falling out. ESPECIALLY if it were as true as Bannon made it sound (He wasn't crucial, keep bearing with me). The relations got really sour for a while. POTUS denounced relationship with Bannon, and Bannon went on to keep his narrative that he was crucial to the election. Bannon, 'tried', to help in special elections, ect. Once it was obvious to Normie's(even republican normies), Bannon basically tried to make up with the POTUS in a round about way. He's back to talking good about the POTUS till this day. Again, thanks for bearing with me. BUT, is it possible people like Bannon were planted by 'THEM'? To do many things, such as, make the POTUS LOOK bad, GIVE bad advice(POTUS is relatively new to government, THANK GOD), ECT. HOW MANY others could there be? I COULD be off track with my thoughts, but I was trying to go back to a 10k ft view for a minute. THESE 'people' I'm speaking of could be spread all throughout the admin, ALONG with all the 'career'(them, but obviously not all) govt employees. What do the rest of you anons think?

Anonymous ID: b655a5 April 28, 2018, 11:18 p.m. No.1231238   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1231196

Okay, SHILL. What was WRONG with my spacing? Did I hit a sore spot(am I on to something)? Are you upset when all is said and done, you'll be necked? Which part of the 'grief' process are you in? Even if your NOT a shill(highly unlikely), why f with my post? It was just a thought/observation that I don't think I've ever seen an anon(or Q) address.

Anonymous ID: b655a5 April 28, 2018, 11:25 p.m. No.1231286   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1231196

Just re-read my post to make sure the spacing wasn't off. You shills are TRULY getting desperate. So to lead anons off of more digging, your going to be a grammar Nazi? The desperateness is VERY obvious. I have a few trees that I'd gladly volunTOLD, to help with all the necking. Along with PLENTY of .223 and .45 ammo. HOPE your not one of 'them', but I think your post is pretty telling.

Anonymous ID: b655a5 April 28, 2018, 11:42 p.m. No.1231372   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1387 >>1404

>>1231329

He's a damn KENYAN! His 'presidency' will be null and void once the truth comes out. I'm 'glad' people of color(black, hispanic, asian) were able to realize they US truly is color blind NOW (I can definitely conceded that last part with you). Even though the Kenyan/Muslim tried to damage/divide those relations his whole 'presidency'. I DO WONDER how the history books will present that period. We had no president for 8 years(act)?

Anonymous ID: b655a5 April 28, 2018, 11:48 p.m. No.1231410   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1231387

That will definitely be part of the description for that 8 year period(can't even call it a 'presidency', since he should have never been allowed to run for office in the first place, i.e. not a citizen).

Anonymous ID: b655a5 April 28, 2018, 11:55 p.m. No.1231448   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1231404

Agreed, 100000%. I still find it so hard to believe people look at his election as a great phenomina. Again, the only good thing about his election, was the proof of our great contries colorblindness. I just wish his dividing(after his election) could be forgotten. He set back race relations 40 years, at least. I just hope after he, and the rest of them are necked, people of all races realize all the division he brought to our great county!

Anonymous ID: b655a5 April 28, 2018, 11:59 p.m. No.1231475   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1231447

IF that's what he meant, maybe he should have explained it like that. The 'structure' of a document is DIFFERENT than spacing. After your explanation, I can concede, I probably could have 'structured' it a bit better. That said, I still think that anon was a shill.

Anonymous ID: b655a5 April 29, 2018, 12:31 a.m. No.1231655   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1231621

Seen Q's comms like this the other day in a post by an anon. Didn't think about this until just now, but I remember Q talking about side by side/s(can't remember the post well enough, but don't think he specifically said anything about side by side memes, but could be wrong). Lately, he's been constantly bringing up, 'Do you know/understand the comms'. Maybe it's possible Q was telling us to look at his comms, 'side by side'.