>>1230859

i aint mad though

>>1230942

understood.

i suppose i was more asking in the sense of…

is there any way you can link to a previous 'heads-up' you made and the corresponding event that was prevented, or not?

again… i'm trying to sound like 'you better prove yourself'. i'm merely asking out of curiosity. if that makes sense

>>1231145

hey, who/what ever you are, thanks for your input.

i appreciate your perspective, and vision (pun/no pun)