This logic should not be used to conclude that everything he says is true. Its probably a mix of truth and false myths. What I find interesting is that he hasnt been sued for the false black eye photo of Roberts. Maybe he is baiting for suit on the false to bring true evidence. Or maybe his discernment is simply imperfect like the rest of human.
I listened to plenty of his and field mcconnel’’s stuff. Never understood their angle. Interesting to see wood now taking similar position.