Q#4881

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 10/17/2020 12:36:26

https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746

There is 'Q'. 1

There are 'Anons'. 2

There is no 'Qanon'. 3

Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?

DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?

Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].

You are correct, CJ.

Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]

Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?

Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.

Q

>>12314034

There is no 'Qanon'

>>12314099

Your list is subject to dispute,

>>12314144

All the suspended Patriots accounts from Twitter are missing.

>>12314212

Well, they're all lumped in to one category 'Digital Soldiers' in that list, so it makes it look like there are more bad guys than good.

>>12314208

>>12314290

Fair enough, but I would say digital soldiers vastly outnumber BLM and Antifa.

The logic of the structure can have all the democrats lumped into one group 'Democrats'.

I think it needs individual names only.

>>12314406

This has oppo research written all over it.

>>12314439

Ok Satanist.

>>12314450

I really wasn't sending that comment to you.

>>12314547

But wait, there's more!