This has been true since Nov 2, 2017, the day Q first started using the 'Q' signature in their drops.

Q#4881

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 10/17/2020 12:36:26

https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746

There is 'Q'. 1

There are 'Anons'. 2

There is no 'Qanon'. 3

Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?

DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?

Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].

You are correct, CJ.

Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]

Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?

Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.

Q

>>12325659

Posting a Q drop is NEVER a 'slide'.

This is a research board DEDICATED to Q drops.

What IS a slide are the subsequent attacks against it, as you are doing.

Just let it be, and by you not attacking it, there is no slide.

>>12325671

Is there another Q drop that receives more attacks than Q4881?

This is not a game.

I have learned to play the game.

>>12325694

That's a weaksauce narrative.

First, you don't have any sauce for your claims about the 'motivations' of those Q drop posters you're referring to. There is no way for Anons to distinguish your attacks intended for Anons or for inauthentic Anons.

Second, there is no way for Anons to distinguish your smearing and slandering Q4881 as 'disinfo' to be authentic or inauthentic, because Fake News has a huge interest in kicking the 'Qanon' narrative can down the road, as Anons already know.

Third, I reiterate my question, is there any other Q drop that receives more attacks than 4881?

The fact that in my experience it receives the most attacks out of any other, is like Q said proof it's over the target.

The attacks, contrary to the desires of the shills attacking it, ENCOURAGES Anons to keep posting it.

As long as Fake News publishes hit pieces on 'Qanon', you're going to see that drop posted here, and you're just going to have to cope with it.

There is in principle no criticism or attack you could ever lodge against it to make Anons stop, because those attacks are themselves signals that posting it is fully and completely justified.

>>12325781

You don't speak for everyone here.

You're just invoking the same tired collectivist "It's all of us against just you" intimidation tactic that doesn't work.

I am not here for 'attention'. I am an Anon. I receive no name fame.

If you 'imagine' what you call 'attention whoring' in me, it's really your own psychology projected onto me. You are trying to use your own flaw of wanting attention for legitimacy to attack Anon.

Q4881 does nor divide. Fake News attacking 'Qanon' is what is meant to divide. Posting Q4881 ELIMINATES in semantic form that division narrative.

You're accusing Anons of what you yourself want, more division through 'Qanon' hit pieces.