Here's a question for Logic Anons. Let's supose, for the sake of argument, that irrefutable proof that the Democrats, under Johnson, assassinated MLK through the FBI.

Why didn't the Bushes use that card? If this were a D v R battle, you'd expect them to – the Republicans were reduced to hoping (we are told by the MSM) that they could woo 'Conservative', Catholic Hispanics to their fold, in crucial states such as Florida.

So, may we conclude that hole card doesn't exist, or not?

>>1234068

So if the hole card exists, and is revealed, it would make a dandy red pill.

But there's a problem – you can't use the hole card to convert blacks to an R v D battle (which by hypothesis you suggest doesn't exist anyway…)

So

1/ what purpose does it serve, as a play?

2/ does it imply that if played, there must also be a play against the Bushes?