Q#4881
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 10/17/2020 12:36:26
https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746
There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'. 3
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
You are correct, CJ.
Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]
Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?
Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.
Q
You're looking at it.
Senate failed 3rd grade math on that one.
Can't have more votes than there are voters.
Apparently that math is too advanced.
Reconcile this with Sidney, CM, and Lin portraying Pence a traitor.
Yes, the muhjoo shills are indeed defending Marxism by invoking his narrative here.
Selfkill again
Well at least the cabal narrative from this clown is that Q is no longer an individual 400 lbs hacker.
Now it's 'crowdsourced'.
Senate vote on PA objection shows 92 Senators don't understand basic logic that you can't have more votes than there are voters.
>jidf
>jidf