O. Well of course he got banned again.
Right on, Lin! We love you!
crickets
>the truth will become obvious to all in time
>I dont enjoy beating anons over the head with information
Makes sense. Honest.
>>12370573 >>12370584
He answered your question O, though you don't like the answer, he thinks differently than you, not necessarily in a bad way. He'd rather anons figure things out more.
Anon thinks they really were about to go to the nearby Fort and then someone up top was given a note about what historical significance it had and they rebooted back to the Capitol.
true. good point. yeah, that's not good. but within the context of the thread his point was tight, so thanks for the clarification.
been baker enough to know 126 hours in a week is not possible.
> if Barkeep called it out they would attack him as they attack me
Absolutely, and that would not be a good thing in general, for anons. You handle it really well, but not everyone can or should.
fog of war. this anon is coming to the conclusion there is a common enemy that you both fight, with different styles.
in which case Barkeep just elegantly defended himself against friendly fire WHILE BAKING so thats cool.
>not attacking you
you called his integrity into question, and promptly provided sauce to back up your claim, so it was not entirely a logical fallacy you were pointing out.
now i love you both.