>>12371202

Armed men with the military grab you. You get sat in a room in front of people. Everything on your hard drive, that has been on your hard drive, that google thought you might want on your hard drive is spelled out. Every phone call and text you have ever received is available to them. Even several times you thought you covered your tracks, it turns out you or someone in the chain of people you were talking to was an asset of the military intelligence complex.

They can rifle through these records as they will, with zero regard for your privacy, standards of evidence entry, etc.

They then determine whether or not you are considered to be guilty of treason and if you get to go back to your life or if you go swing from a rope.

Have you ever heard of GrayFish, anon?

https://www.wired.com/2015/02/nsa-firmware-hacking/

This is not the NSA proper's tool. No Such Agency. The official NSA is as incompetent as every other government agency, but the people who developed this tool have complete and total digital penetration.

Solar winds hack was, in all probability, them.

They are what I refer to as "the real military" - they are both inside and outside the standard military and intelligence complex, being able to tap into its resources and yet act well outside its legal constraints.

They would be who Q is a part of.

>>12371326

True, but the use of lethal force in that situation was not authorized under the standards. If I were to shoot that girl in identical circumstances anywhere else while in uniform, I would be up shit creek.

>>12371406

I disagree with that assessment, anon. However, I am also not one who would be breaking into the capitol building unarmed. To some extent - play stupid games and win stupid prizes. I don't personally expect cops to not shoot me in a situation they perceive to be a riot and respect that reality by resolving to have my plans revolve around shooting at them first, fair and square. No mind fucks with are we protesters. 'I am here to kill you if you are in my way and will dispense with it in manners I deem expedient.'

>>12371478

I mean, it's not too hard to find their business dealings and associations with China. While that is not 'proof' they are knowingly subverting the Constitution by certifying a fraudulent vote - it certainly brongs to surface a number of questions about their interests as it pertains to their oaths of office.

>>12371754

Them.

They want anarchy to destroy the U.S. as an organized entity. Makes it easy to part out. Yugoslavia.