>>12375300 pb

>>12375846 pb

Cleverly worded by POTUS ; Left out any concession.

"End of first term'

is different from End of Presidency

Leaves open for 2nd term

>>12374585

He's faking 'em out

"HE WILL FOOL THE PEOPLE"

I'm an "I was there-er" Which doesn't mean I knew what all was going on.

But I do know a large number of the people who "stormed the Capital" were 'Black Flag"

I spoke out to at least three separate individuals and they confirmed by their silence / and / or by answering me as though I was one of them that that's who they were.

I said to one "Black Flag is in trouble now" and she replied "yeah we're trying to get them out now"

Likely she mistook me for one of her own. Most patriots would be ignorant of the term "black flag"

I called them out a few more times as I ran across them, and the seconds ones said "They already have that i.e. nothing new" and looked startled. Since I told them "Black Flag faces are all on camera now"

There was crickets as far as denial of term "black flag" for protest against my use of the term

By their lack of correction / protest they assented and let on they knew exactly what I was saying.

A few who were involved. or who thought it was a good thing whom I spoke and who were perhaps actual Patriots "oathkeeper" didn't realize the people who they were rioting with or who would've like to riot with were anarchists?

I didn't have the best answers for them at that moment (wit of the stairwell - what I should've said came later) but they felt the moment for action was here, after seeing the behavior of Pence ; the apparant lack of direct action by POTUS and were impatient with waiting; They wanted to stop the harm to our Country.

These types probably bought into the type of talk the Provocateur shills put up here.

The leaders of the group though were obvious provocateurs

The obvious anarchists = by dress and demeanor - I confronted made zero denials / corrections.

>>12376311 pb

yes there were snipers on buildings

Strange to me , the woman who got killed?

Too many anomalies on that story

Then later in the night they added three more dead?

But crickets at the time

Didn't even hear an ambulance.

No word of anyone dead right away

Woman who was there inside who I spoke with didn't know anyone died there, Had to be told by the news media.

When the story has too many gaps it usually means ~ like a Sandy Hook situation.

That's how I knew Sandy Hook was fraud within ten minutes in. Too many anomalies in their story line - if it were real there would be a solid set of details.- not just whatever they feel like saying.

But this:

Wouldn't it be strange if the Capitol was breached by violent mob and not one death?

They had to have at least one death (then added three more later) to make the scene plausible?