>>12384973

Q#4881

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 10/17/2020 12:36:26

https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746

There is 'Q'. 1

There are 'Anons'. 2

There is no 'Qanon'. 3

Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?

DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?

Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].

You are correct, CJ.

Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]

Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?

Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.

Q

https://twitter.com/FCC/status/1347223453166931969

[ON READY]

>>12385498

Good thing that overrated General was fired.

>>12385503

Try 80 gorillion.

>>12385449

Could really use some of those military tribunals right about now.

>>12385547

That was 'approved' insurrection, domestic terrorism and sedition because the protestors were engaged in Marxist 'revolutionary praxis' looting and destruction and killings, so it was ok.

>>12385447

>https://federalinquirer.com/global-defense-contractor-it-expert-testifies-in-italian-court-he-and-others-switched-votes-in-the-u-s-presidential-race/

Why didn't the Senate or the House even debate these facts?